Posts Tagged ‘review’

Apr 07

Thank god for Patrick: here’s his review of Alice in Wonderland:

___________________________________________________

So, I haven’t been the best at keeping up with this so far but, as my goal is to post regularly, from here on in there will be one post a week. Like the blog itself, I’ll try to deal with what’s current, but sometimes we’re going to have to dig into the past.

So, getting down to it, let’s talk about Alice in Wonderland, my first experience of the new digital 3D process. Let me put it this way, years ago I was fortunate enough to see a lovely little opus called Stewardesses in 3D. The premise is simple, stewardesses are on leave for the weekend, hijinx ensue. Probably the worst Russ Meyer rip-off ever, Stewardesses does what every other old-school 3D film does, it gives you a flat story, and keeps jabbing stuff into the foreground to remind you just how cool 3D is. Basically, it’s bad 1970s pseudo-sexual revolution film, with a few bouncing breasts and one large cocktail thrust in your face.

Alice in Wonderland is obviously more high-class than that—a girl falls down a rabbit hole, hijinx ensue. But I’ll throw it out there right now and claim that it uses the same formula. The film pales in comparison with the Disney adaptation from 1951…challenge me if you want…and may very well pale against the older live action versions, which I’ve never seen. Burton, aided by screenwriter Linda Woolverton, seem to be trying to mix Through the Looking Glass, Alice in Wonderland and creative license into some form of an ‘unparalleled experience in cinematic fantasy.’ Do we care? Well, not really. To begin, the characters, whether you remember them from earlier versions or not, do very little of interest, and can be outright boring. To compensate, Burton has added some new characters, including the White Queen, who presides over the good part of Underland (no longer Wonderland), but who really just likes like Gandalf’s niece. In fact, the whole movie kind of feels like a shoddy remake of The Lord of the Rings trilogy, meant to fit into the space of two hours. An unsuspecting outsider finds herself on a quest of great importance to bringing peace two an entire world. Guided by a knowledgeable sage, she is aided by different creatures along the way. Finally, she accepts her role as the champion of a new world order and kills the Jabberwocky, a wicked beast that wreaks evil with its fiery claws. Some characters may blur the comparison, but its pretty lord of the rings-ish…

Anyway, you get to experience the majesty of all this in 3D, and when things get flat, Alice, the playing card soldiers, the Cheshire cat, the rose bush—just like in Stewardesses, everybody starts thrusting things in your face. But, to be fair, the 3D is, on occasion, really impressive, with characters floating off the screen and right out over the audience. For moments, the film gets really cool, and is like nothing I’ve seen in the old format…not even grandpa goes through the window. Still, I’m not sure that it was cool enough to shatter the meaning of my own life, but maybe that’s too cynical, or too unfair to Avatar.

Anyway, to finish on a positive note, there are several other Alice adaptations for rent in K/W, at places like Gen X—and these include two of the sexploitation versions—so when you’re done with Burton’s, and you want to see what other people have tried, you can check them out…I’m banking on the 1966 BBC production being pretty solid.

Until next time…

- plf.

Mar 10

The opening scene of Shutter Island throws up a flare. When Di Caprio and co-star Mark Ruffalo launch into their version of 1950s cop speak, no one in the theatre can avoid being painfully aware that this film has a bad script, and that everyone’s going to suffer through it. The premise of the film is simple, two cops investigate a penal colony for the criminally insane, one of the cops may be insane himself, hijinx ensue.

Along the way, Scorcese throws at you everything in his bag of cinematic tricks, from B-movie clichés, to political intrigue culled from all the unused scripts of The X-Files. Yet, the one thing one cannot shake when watching the film, is the impending sense that you’re always on the verge of not giving the tail end of rat about what’s about to happen. Simply put, there’s too much going on, so much so that it ends revealing the fact that there’s nothing really going on at all. Someone may be crazy, the HUAC committee may be testing on human subjects, psychiatry may be a dirty business, the story may be metaphorical, the ending may be layered with double meanings…till the movie’s just a vacuous showcase of virtuoso performances and slow-motion photography?

After 15 minutes, the only thing you’ll want to know, other than who really killed so and so’s wife, is why great directors of the past are wasting their time with poor scripts, culled from poor novels, written by one writer who doesn’t really seem to know what to do. At some point, all of the greats fall off. Scorcese, please don’t let it be your turn yet.

-plf.

_______________________________

Please Welcome Patrick – a new contributor to RQ.

Patrick is a pretty smart dude, who knows a thing or two about movies.

He attends WLU and is a friend of mine.

He likes going to the kitchener market, but not to Wonderland, where this photo was taken.

It was his birthday and he had NEVER been on a rollercoaster.

We took care of that.

H.

Mar 05

It’s Ramy Nassar photo day on RQ! Yeah!

Here’s some great friend shots from TEDxWaterloo – with ALL the photos HERE if you’d like to get a whole view of the day.






Fun. Ignite Photos up next.

H.